This post is not intended to ruin anyone’s Thanksgiving. I give thanks here for all that is being revealed and to the fullness of time which allows it to unfold. We have nothing to be afraid of and much to be thankful for. This difficult post is offered in gratefulness for all we are and can be.
Offered By SubStack Writer Azra Dale Today in his SubStack All That Is Hidden Will Be Revealed:
I believe the information in the above post illustrates much of what I have to say. It is the fruition of this shadow war which has dogged us for centuries. It represents the last gasp of an international coup which has been perfectly planned over so many years it is beyond the scope of this essay to document. It would very likely take all the remaining libraries of all civilizations to illustrate this.
The major problem for these international thieves. Eventually we the people will come to understand exactly what they have planned and why. I can only assume that since there are billions of us and few of them (the vaunted 1%) that once the people do understand (and if they get the chance before they are destroyed) they will offer a tremendous outcry and resistance. Most people do take murder and attempted murder personally. And it is quite personal and intentional. But that this is a fact remains to be successfully proven to the public. Not everyone is willing to imagine such a diabolical plot.
Coming to the point of being slowly able to recognize all this is a result of three years of investigation with help from so many capable writers and researchers there is simply no space here to list them all. But I thank them all and hold them all dear to my heart. The real problem is if we succeed in understanding this plot and in defusing it and those who have engendered it lies elsewhere. The real problem is how do we choose the right leaders and narratives to follow going forward.
Here I diverge to exploring this concern.
Gary Snyder On The Challenge And The Solutions:
https://thedewdrop.org/2021/07/01/gary-snyder-for-the-children/
The following will not be the best report of the World Economic Forum but it is easier to access than my own post on the subject. Understanding the role of the WEF in all this requires quite a lot of time and energy.
Klaus Schwab On Divide & Conquer
There are better writings on the World Economic Forum but this may furnish some leads
For myself and my family I try to look to the fundamental answers On the one hand we have the “New World Order” and their undeniable planetary power grab as advertised by their public relations agency and country club - Davos and the World Economic Forum. Just as we are eminently susceptible to being fooled by an advertisement we are just as susceptible to the nonsense of skillfully slimy snake oil salesmen.
Klaus and the WEF are among the slimiest and dangerous of these snake oil sellers. “You will have nothing and you’ll be happy” they proclaim. “Build Back Better” they parrot like a bunch of mainstream media toadies. Seems as if we have not learned the lessons of the centuries. When we trade our peace and well being for what we believe is security we lose. Every civilization from time immemorial illustrates this. All have crumbled to dust.
I and my family are no different than others except in maybe where we look for the answers. We have made epic mistakes, looked in the wrong places, as much as anyone. It seems true to me that we are pretty good at only discovering truth well after we have stumbled through a long line of mistakes.
If we listen to professional politicians and others who would sell their parents and offspring for a few dollars and a song we are doomed - individually and collectively. We regularly trade our freedom for what we believe is security. This speaks to a deep insecurity in who we have decided to become. This insecurity is woven throughout the our “civilized” history. No long string of civilized history is more demented than our own. The “nightmare of history” of which James Joyce speaks is our own nightmare. Because we are most afraid of what we are capable of projecting and rationalizing collectively we run from it. We live in fear of it rather than analyzing how we might truly escape it. This is the real War In The Shadows.
If I could write poetry or songs of this I would. But due to my own limitations I must surrender graciously to the poets and musicians. I hope you will find them.
Falling to the many traps of logic is my only refuge. But I try never to engage in logic without looking to the poets and musicians first. Logic informed by these simply seems - well, more logical. In this essay I leave you with some music and poetry I have learned to rely on.
There is a long view, a wider perspective lent by poets. This perspective gives us an alternative to the way we have chosen. To the way which leads to our collective doom in trading our precious chance of recognizing and embracing freedom for what we mistake for security. I for one cannot help but look there and inhabit that space to the best of my limited ability.
https://www.wenaus.org/poetry/gs-civil.html
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/gary-soto
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8705.1966.tb01266.x
https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2020/09/10/the-nature-of-gary-snyder/
Postscript
“Fetch me my feathers and amber”.
Gary Snyder, Civilization
For all we can be when we overcome fear to BE exactly who we are. For the Children.
Happy Thanksgiving. "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”
― Patrick Henry-who as a staunch Anti-Federalist gave his sword to General Washington in acknowledgement that the Federal Union had overcome all logical objections.https://www.let.rug.nl/usa/documents/1786-1800/the-anti-federalist-papers/speech-of-patrick-henry-(june-5-1788).php. Of course the sop tossed to the objectors was the Bill of Rights.
Mr. Chairman ... I rose yesterday to ask a question which arose in my own mind. When I asked that question, I thought the meaning of my interrogation was obvious: The fate of this question and of America may depend on this: Have they said, we, the States? Have they made a proposal of a compact between states? If they had, this would be a confederation: It is otherwise most clearly a consolidated government. The question turns, Sir, on that poor little thing-the expression, We, the people, instead of the States, of America. I need not take much pains to show that the principles of this system are extremely pernicious, impolitic, and dangerous. Is this a monarchy, like England-a compact between prince and people, with checks on the former to secure the liberty of the latter? Is this a Confederacy, like Holland-an association of a number of independent states, each of which retains its individual sovereignty? It is not a democracy, wherein the people retain all their rights securely. Had these principles been adhered to, we should not have been brought to this alarming transition, from a Confederacy to a consolidated Government. We have no detail of these great consideration, which, in my opinion, ought to have abounded before we should recur to a government of this kind. Here is a revolution as radical as that which separated us from Great Britain. It is radical in this transition; our rights and privileges are endangered, and the sovereignty of the states will be relinquished: And cannot we plainly see that this is actually the case? The rights of conscience, trial by jury, liberty of the press, all your immunities and franchises, all pretensions to human rights and privileges, are rendered insecure, if not lost, by this change, so loudly talked of by some, and inconsiderately by others. Is this tame relinquishment of rights worthy of freemen? Is it worthy of that manly fortitude that ought to characterize republicans: It is said eight States have adopted this plan. I declare that if twelve States and a half had adopted it, I would, with manly firmness, and in spite of an erring world, reject it. You are not to inquire how your trade may be increased, nor how you are to become a great and powerful people, but how your liberties can be secured; for liberty ought to be the direct end of your Government. Having premised these things, I shall, with the aid of my judgment and information, which, I confess, are not extensive, go into the discussion of this system more minutely. Is it necessary for your liberty that you should abandon those great rights by the adoption of this system? Is the relinquishment of the trial by jury and the liberty of the press necessary for your liberty? Will the abandonment of your most sacred rights tend to the security of your liberty?
Day by day Congress erodes these rights of States. The People of the United States override.