Discussion about this post

User's avatar
mani malagón's avatar

Thx 4 sharing. I don't understand: that matters not, the "who" that interprets is evanescent & can only briefly glimpse the fleeting meteor's tail.

Existence is not in•action but inter•action, or rather —be•in(g) is inte•action: no algorithmic dis•entaglement, no Gordian knot to un•ravel, but a 1•ness, a unity, a tonality, a spectrum invisibly pulsing celestial melodies beyond mind's keen. What's written or spoken or thought or felt or acted on is will-o'-the-wisp (ignis fatuus), —fleeting & shifting & unfolding.

As Camus advices in an absurd universe, —"Be a happy Sisyphus."

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts