Thx 4 sharing. I don't understand: that matters not, the "who" that interprets is evanescent & can only briefly glimpse the fleeting meteor's tail.
Existence is not in•action but inter•action, or rather —be•in(g) is inte•action: no algorithmic dis•entaglement, no Gordian knot to un•ravel, but a 1•ness, a unity, a tonality, a spectrum invisibly pulsing celestial melodies beyond mind's keen. What's written or spoken or thought or felt or acted on is will-o'-the-wisp (ignis fatuus), —fleeting & shifting & unfolding.
As Camus advices in an absurd universe, —"Be a happy Sisyphus."
Thx 4 sharing. I don't understand: that matters not, the "who" that interprets is evanescent & can only briefly glimpse the fleeting meteor's tail.
Existence is not in•action but inter•action, or rather —be•in(g) is inte•action: no algorithmic dis•entaglement, no Gordian knot to un•ravel, but a 1•ness, a unity, a tonality, a spectrum invisibly pulsing celestial melodies beyond mind's keen. What's written or spoken or thought or felt or acted on is will-o'-the-wisp (ignis fatuus), —fleeting & shifting & unfolding.
As Camus advices in an absurd universe, —"Be a happy Sisyphus."
Thanks for reading and responding.
I don’t agree that Camus in his work advises that we “be a happy Sisyphus”.
Nor do I agree it is the fate of our species - or that the universe is absurd.
A wide difference in philosophical perspectives.
Positing a quantum universe means something quite different.
As the proverb says, —"If I agree or disagree with you, we're both still wrong."
So much for proverbs.
Quantum entanglement.
Everything in the known universe is entangled!